Buzzfeed sso vs Caddy Security
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Buzzfeed sso | Caddy Security |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 15 · At risk | 86 · Excellent |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,122 | ★ 2,238 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Access | Cloudflare Access |
What are Buzzfeed sso and Caddy Security?
Buzzfeed sso
Buzzfeed sso is an open-source single sign-on solution providing OAuth-based authentication for internal services. It is self-hosted as a reverse-proxy auth layer in front of applications.
- OAuth-based SSO
- Reverse-proxy auth
- Multiple provider support
- Internal service protection
Caddy Security
Caddy Security is an open-source plugin suite for the Caddy web server that adds authentication portals, authorization policies, and SSO. It provides self-hosted identity features directly inside the proxy.
- Auth portal for Caddy
- OAuth and SAML support
- Authorization policies
- MFA support
Buzzfeed sso vs Caddy Security: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: Buzzfeed sso's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Caddy Security is actively maintained. Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Buzzfeed sso versus Apache-2.0 for Caddy Security. Caddy Security is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Buzzfeed sso. Buzzfeed sso is the more established project (first released 2018), while Caddy Security arrived in 2021. Buzzfeed sso lists first-class Docker deployment; Caddy Security does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Buzzfeed sso if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Caddy Security if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Buzzfeed sso or Caddy Security better?
Neither is universally better. Buzzfeed sso has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Buzzfeed sso and Caddy Security free and open-source?
Yes. Buzzfeed sso is licensed under MIT and Caddy Security under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Buzzfeed sso and Caddy Security with Docker?
Buzzfeed sso: yes. Caddy Security: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Buzzfeed sso or Caddy Security?
Caddy Security has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Buzzfeed sso. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.