Keycloak vs LDAP Account Manager
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keycloak
Open-source identity and access management for modern apps
VS
LDAP Account Manager
Web frontend for managing entries in an LDAP directory
| Feature | Keycloak | LDAP Account Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 36,058 | ★ 486 |
| First released | 2014 | 2003 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID | Active Directory Users and Computers |
Why pick each one
Choose LDAP Account Manager if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Keycloak or LDAP Account Manager better?
Neither is universally better. Keycloak has the larger community, while LDAP Account Manager is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Keycloak and LDAP Account Manager free and open-source?
Yes. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LDAP Account Manager under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keycloak and LDAP Account Manager with Docker?
Keycloak: yes. LDAP Account Manager: yes.