Kestra vs Skyvern
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kestra
Declarative orchestration and scheduling platform
VS
Skyvern
Automate browser workflows with LLMs and computer vision
| Feature | Kestra | Skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 27,575 | ★ 22,708 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | UiPath, Zapier |
Why pick each one
Choose Kestra if…
- Strong for data orchestration
- Scalable architecture
- Open-source license
Choose Skyvern if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Kestra or Skyvern better?
Neither is universally better. Kestra has the larger community, while Skyvern is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kestra and Skyvern free and open-source?
Yes. Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Skyvern under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kestra and Skyvern with Docker?
Kestra: yes. Skyvern: yes.