Kerberos Factory vs OpenALPR

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKerberos FactoryOpenALPR
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM4,096 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35★ 11,440
First released20212015
ReplacesMilestone XProtect, GenetecRekor Scout, Plate Recognizer

Why pick each one

Choose Kerberos Factory if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Go
Kerberos Factory details

Choose OpenALPR if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
OpenALPR details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kerberos Factory or OpenALPR better?

Neither is universally better. OpenALPR has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kerberos Factory and OpenALPR free and open-source?

Yes. Kerberos Factory is licensed under MIT and OpenALPR under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kerberos Factory and OpenALPR with Docker?

Kerberos Factory: yes. OpenALPR: yes.

Related comparisons