go2rtc vs Kerberos Factory
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
go2rtc
Ultimate camera streaming gateway with low latency
VS
Kerberos Factory
Scalable video analytics platform for cameras
| Feature | go2rtc | Kerberos Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,837 | ★ 35 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Milestone XProtect, Genetec |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Factory if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is go2rtc or Kerberos Factory better?
go2rtc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kerberos Factory if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are go2rtc and Kerberos Factory free and open-source?
Yes. go2rtc is licensed under MIT and Kerberos Factory under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run go2rtc and Kerberos Factory with Docker?
go2rtc: yes. Kerberos Factory: yes.