Kerberos.io Machinery vs Kerberos Factory

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKerberos.io MachineryKerberos Factory
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score10 · At risk62 · Good
StatusArchivedActively maintained
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 486★ 35
First released20142021
ReplacesMilestone XProtect, Blue IrisMilestone XProtect, Genetec

What are Kerberos.io Machinery and Kerberos Factory?

Kerberos.io Machinery

Kerberos Machinery is the open-source video surveillance recording engine of the Kerberos.io ecosystem. It captures, records, and processes video from IP and USB cameras with motion detection and event-based recording.

  • Video recording engine
  • Motion-based capture
  • IP and USB camera support
  • Event-driven processing

Kerberos Factory

Kerberos Factory is a self-hosted platform for managing many camera agents and applying video analytics at scale. It centralizes configuration, storage, and analytics across distributed surveillance deployments.

  • Centralized camera fleet
  • Scalable analytics
  • Kubernetes deployment
  • Distributed storage

Kerberos.io Machinery vs Kerberos Factory: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: Kerberos.io Machinery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Kerberos Factory is actively maintained. Kerberos.io Machinery is written in C++, while Kerberos Factory is built with Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Kerberos.io Machinery versus MIT for Kerberos Factory. Kerberos.io Machinery is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 4,096 MB for Kerberos Factory. Kerberos.io Machinery is the more established project (first released 2014), while Kerberos Factory arrived in 2021. Kerberos.io Machinery has the considerably larger community, at 486 GitHub stars versus 35.

Why pick each one

Choose Kerberos.io Machinery if…

  • Lightweight engine
  • Part of broader ecosystem

Watch out for

  • Best with Kerberos suite
  • Single-camera per instance
Kerberos.io Machinery details

Choose Kerberos Factory if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Go
Kerberos Factory details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kerberos.io Machinery or Kerberos Factory better?

Kerberos.io Machinery is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kerberos.io Machinery if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kerberos.io Machinery and Kerberos Factory free and open-source?

Yes. Kerberos.io Machinery is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kerberos Factory under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kerberos.io Machinery and Kerberos Factory with Docker?

Kerberos.io Machinery: yes. Kerberos Factory: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Kerberos.io Machinery or Kerberos Factory?

Kerberos.io Machinery has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 4,096 MB for Kerberos Factory. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons