Kerberos Vault vs ZoneMinder
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Vault
Storage and lifecycle management for surveillance recordings
VS
ZoneMinder
Full-featured closed-circuit television software suite
| Feature | Kerberos Vault | ZoneMinder |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 42 | ★ 5,899 |
| First released | 2021 | 2002 |
| Replaces | Milestone XProtect | Blue Iris, Milestone XProtect |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Vault if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Vault or ZoneMinder better?
Neither is universally better. ZoneMinder has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kerberos Vault and ZoneMinder free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Vault is licensed under MIT and ZoneMinder under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Vault and ZoneMinder with Docker?
Kerberos Vault: yes. ZoneMinder: yes.