Kerberos Vault vs CameraView
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Vault
Storage and lifecycle management for surveillance recordings
VS
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
| Feature | Kerberos Vault | CameraView |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 42 | ★ 5,128 |
| First released | 2021 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Milestone XProtect | Proprietary camera SDKs |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Vault if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Vault or CameraView better?
CameraView is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kerberos Vault if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kerberos Vault and CameraView free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Vault is licensed under MIT and CameraView under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Vault and CameraView with Docker?
Kerberos Vault: yes. CameraView: check the project docs for container support.