Frigate Mobile Companion vs CameraView
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
VS
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
| Feature | Frigate Mobile Companion | CameraView |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | HTML | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,150 | ★ 5,128 |
| First released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Wowza | Proprietary camera SDKs |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Mobile Companion or CameraView better?
Frigate Mobile Companion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CameraView if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Frigate Mobile Companion and CameraView free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Mobile Companion is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CameraView under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Mobile Companion and CameraView with Docker?
Frigate Mobile Companion: yes. CameraView: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- CameraView vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- CameraView vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- CameraView vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- CameraView vs camera-streamer
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- CameraView vs Cameradar