Kerberos Agent vs Motion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Agent
Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
VS
Motion
Lightweight motion-detection video surveillance daemon
| Feature | Kerberos Agent | Motion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,088 | ★ 4,030 |
| First released | 2014 | 2000 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Agent or Motion better?
Neither is universally better. Motion has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kerberos Agent and Motion free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and Motion under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Agent and Motion with Docker?
Kerberos Agent: yes. Motion: yes.