kepler.gl vs Streamlit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
kepler.gl
Open-source geospatial data visualization tool
VS
Streamlit
Turn Python scripts into shareable data apps
| Feature | kepler.gl | Streamlit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,954 | ★ 45,512 |
| First released | 2018 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Tableau, ArcGIS | Retool, Tableau |
Why pick each one
Choose kepler.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Streamlit if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 45.5k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is kepler.gl or Streamlit better?
Streamlit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider kepler.gl if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are kepler.gl and Streamlit free and open-source?
Yes. kepler.gl is licensed under MIT and Streamlit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run kepler.gl and Streamlit with Docker?
kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support. Streamlit: yes.