kepler.gl vs Redash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
kepler.gl
Open-source geospatial data visualization tool
VS
Redash
Connect, query, visualize, and share your data
| Feature | kepler.gl | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,954 | ★ 28,737 |
| First released | 2018 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Tableau, ArcGIS | Tableau, Mode Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose kepler.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Redash if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is kepler.gl or Redash better?
Neither is universally better. Redash has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are kepler.gl and Redash free and open-source?
Yes. kepler.gl is licensed under MIT and Redash under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run kepler.gl and Redash with Docker?
kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support. Redash: yes.