kepler.gl vs React Leaflet Maps

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurekepler.glReact Leaflet Maps
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITHippocratic-2.1
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcesource
GitHub stars★ 11,954★ 5,598
First released20182015
ReplacesTableau, ArcGISGoogle Maps React, Mapbox React

Why pick each one

Choose kepler.gl if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
kepler.gl details

Choose React Leaflet Maps if…

  • Released under the Hippocratic-2.1 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
React Leaflet Maps details

Frequently asked questions

Is kepler.gl or React Leaflet Maps better?

Neither is universally better. kepler.gl has the larger community, while React Leaflet Maps is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are kepler.gl and React Leaflet Maps free and open-source?

Yes. kepler.gl is licensed under MIT and React Leaflet Maps under Hippocratic-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run kepler.gl and React Leaflet Maps with Docker?

kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support. React Leaflet Maps: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons