Kener vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKenerGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageSvelteGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 5,091★ 28,687
First released20232018
ReplacesStatuspage, Better UptimeSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Kener if…

  • Attractive modern UI
  • Easy to deploy
Kener details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kener or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Kener is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kener and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Kener is licensed under MIT and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kener and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Kener: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons