KeeWeb vs Rubywarden
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
KeeWeb
Web-based client for KeePass databases
VS
Rubywarden
Experimental Ruby implementation of the Bitwarden API
| Feature | KeeWeb | Rubywarden |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | HTML | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,977 | ★ 589 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | Bitwarden, 1Password |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is KeeWeb or Rubywarden better?
KeeWeb is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rubywarden if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are KeeWeb and Rubywarden free and open-source?
Yes. KeeWeb is licensed under MIT and Rubywarden under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run KeeWeb and Rubywarden with Docker?
KeeWeb: yes. Rubywarden: check the project docs for container support.