KeeWeb vs pass-tomb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
KeeWeb
Web-based client for KeePass databases
VS
pass-tomb
Encrypted storage extension for the pass manager
| Feature | KeeWeb | pass-tomb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,977 | ★ 435 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | 1Password, KeePass |
Why pick each one
Choose pass-tomb if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is KeeWeb or pass-tomb better?
KeeWeb is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pass-tomb if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are KeeWeb and pass-tomb free and open-source?
Yes. KeeWeb is licensed under MIT and pass-tomb under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run KeeWeb and pass-tomb with Docker?
KeeWeb: yes. pass-tomb: check the project docs for container support.