OpenCloud vs elFinder
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenCloud
Modern open-source file platform from ownCloud team
VS
elFinder
Web file manager with a desktop-style interface
| Feature | OpenCloud | elFinder |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,792 | ★ 4,800 |
| First released | 2025 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Google Drive | Google Drive, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenCloud if…
- Modern, fast codebase
- Lightweight footprint
- Permissively licensed
Choose elFinder if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCloud or elFinder better?
Neither is universally better. OpenCloud has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenCloud and elFinder free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCloud is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCloud and elFinder with Docker?
OpenCloud: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.