Komf vs Audiobookshelf-tools

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKomfAudiobookshelf-tools
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryE-books & Media Library
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageKotlinJava
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 691★ 760
First released20222024
ReplacesGoodreadsKindle, Goodreads

Why pick each one

Choose Komf if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Kotlin
Komf details

Choose Audiobookshelf-tools if…

  • Tidy library management
  • Web reader included
  • Active development
Audiobookshelf-tools details

Frequently asked questions

Is Komf or Audiobookshelf-tools better?

Neither is universally better. Audiobookshelf-tools has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Komf and Audiobookshelf-tools free and open-source?

Yes. Komf is licensed under MIT and Audiobookshelf-tools under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Komf and Audiobookshelf-tools with Docker?

Komf: yes. Audiobookshelf-tools: yes.

Related comparisons