Karma vs Oncall
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Karma
Alert dashboard for Prometheus Alertmanager
VS
Oncall
Calendar-based on-call scheduling and team management
| Feature | Karma | Oncall |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,674 | ★ 1,256 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | PagerDuty | PagerDuty |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Karma or Oncall better?
Karma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Oncall if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Karma and Oncall free and open-source?
Yes. Karma is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Oncall under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Karma and Oncall with Docker?
Karma: yes. Oncall: yes.