Karma vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKarmaGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 2,674★ 28,687
First released20172018
ReplacesPagerDutySplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Karma if…

  • Clear at-a-glance overview
  • Lightweight
Karma details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Karma or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Karma is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Karma and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Karma is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Karma and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Karma: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons