Mango vs Suwayomi-Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mango
Self-hosted manga server and web reader
VS
Suwayomi-Server
Self-hosted manga reader and downloader server
| Feature | Mango | Suwayomi-Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | E-books & Media Library |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Crystal | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,782 | ★ 7,418 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | ComiXology | ComiXology |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Mango or Suwayomi-Server better?
Neither is universally better. Suwayomi-Server has the larger community, while Mango is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Mango and Suwayomi-Server free and open-source?
Yes. Mango is licensed under MIT and Suwayomi-Server under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mango and Suwayomi-Server with Docker?
Mango: yes. Suwayomi-Server: yes.