DeDRM Tools vs Mango

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDeDRM ToolsMango
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryE-books & Media Library
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonCrystal
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 15,275★ 1,782
First released20142020
ReplacesAdobe Digital EditionsComiXology

Why pick each one

Choose DeDRM Tools if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 15.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
DeDRM Tools details

Choose Mango if…

  • Very lightweight
  • Simple to deploy
Mango details

Frequently asked questions

Is DeDRM Tools or Mango better?

Neither is universally better. DeDRM Tools has the larger community, while Mango is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are DeDRM Tools and Mango free and open-source?

Yes. DeDRM Tools is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mango under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DeDRM Tools and Mango with Docker?

DeDRM Tools: check the project docs for container support. Mango: yes.

Related comparisons