Karakeep vs Wiki.js
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Karakeep
Self-hosted bookmark everything app with AI tagging
VS
Wiki.js
Modern and powerful open-source wiki
| Feature | Karakeep | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,164 | ★ 28,727 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Wiki.js if…
- Flexible and full-featured
- Many auth options
- Good content management
Frequently asked questions
Is Karakeep or Wiki.js better?
Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Karakeep and Wiki.js free and open-source?
Yes. Karakeep is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Karakeep and Wiki.js with Docker?
Karakeep: yes. Wiki.js: yes.