Apache Allura vs SourceHut
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Allura
Open-source forge for managing source code and projects
VS
SourceHut
The hacker's forge, 100% free and open source
| Feature | Apache Allura | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 148 | ★ 2,000 |
| First released | 2012 | 2018 |
| Replaces | GitHub, SourceForge | GitHub, GitLab |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache Allura if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose SourceHut if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Allura or SourceHut better?
Neither is universally better. SourceHut has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Apache Allura and SourceHut free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Allura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SourceHut under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Allura and SourceHut with Docker?
Apache Allura: yes. SourceHut: check the project docs for container support.