Joplin vs Tiddloid
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Joplin
Open-source note-taking and to-do app with sync
VS
Tiddloid
Host and edit single-file TiddlyWiki wikis
| Feature | Joplin | Tiddloid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 55,856 | ★ 284 |
| First released | 2017 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Evernote, OneNote | Evernote, OneNote |
Why pick each one
Choose Tiddloid if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Java
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Joplin or Tiddloid better?
Neither is universally better. Joplin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Joplin and Tiddloid free and open-source?
Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tiddloid under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Joplin and Tiddloid with Docker?
Joplin: yes. Tiddloid: check the project docs for container support.