Joomla vs Pagekit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Joomla
Versatile CMS balancing power and ease of use
VS
Pagekit
Modular and lightweight CMS with a modern interface
| Feature | Joomla | Pagekit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,122 | ★ 5,457 |
| First released | 2005 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Joomla or Pagekit better?
Pagekit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Joomla if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Joomla and Pagekit free and open-source?
Yes. Joomla is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Pagekit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Joomla and Pagekit with Docker?
Joomla: yes. Pagekit: yes.