Jekyll vs Shuttlecraft
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jekyll
Simple, blog-aware static site generator
VS
Shuttlecraft
Single-user IndieWeb blog with ActivityPub support
| Feature | Jekyll | Shuttlecraft |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 51,622 | ★ 271 |
| First released | 2008 | 2023 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Blogger | Twitter, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose Shuttlecraft if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jekyll or Shuttlecraft better?
Neither is universally better. Jekyll has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Jekyll and Shuttlecraft free and open-source?
Yes. Jekyll is licensed under MIT and Shuttlecraft under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jekyll and Shuttlecraft with Docker?
Jekyll: check the project docs for container support. Shuttlecraft: yes.