Jangouts vs Peer-calls
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jangouts
Videoconferencing based on WebRTC and Janus Gateway with an UI
VS
Peer-calls
Group peer to peer video calls for everyone
| Feature | Jangouts | Peer-calls |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 444 | ★ 1,903 |
| First released | 2025 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Hangouts, Skype | BigBlueButton, Skype, Zoom |
Why pick each one
Choose Jangouts if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Peer-calls if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Jangouts or Peer-calls better?
Peer-calls is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jangouts if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jangouts and Peer-calls free and open-source?
Yes. Jangouts is licensed under MIT and Peer-calls under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jangouts and Peer-calls with Docker?
Jangouts: check the project docs for container support. Peer-calls: check the project docs for container support.