Jangouts vs mediasoup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jangouts
Videoconferencing based on WebRTC and Janus Gateway with an UI
VS
mediasoup
Cutting-edge WebRTC SFU library for Node.js
| Feature | Jangouts | mediasoup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Language | JavaScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 444 | ★ 7,325 |
| First released | 2025 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Hangouts, Skype | Twilio Video |
Why pick each one
Choose Jangouts if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose mediasoup if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jangouts or mediasoup better?
Neither is universally better. mediasoup has the larger community, while Jangouts is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jangouts and mediasoup free and open-source?
Yes. Jangouts is licensed under MIT and mediasoup under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jangouts and mediasoup with Docker?
Jangouts: check the project docs for container support. mediasoup: check the project docs for container support.