Jami Server Bridge vs Screego
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jami Server Bridge
Self-hosted name registry and bridge for the Jami network
VS
Screego
Screen sharing for developers
| Feature | Jami Server Bridge | Screego |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 400 | ★ 10,478 |
| First released | 2017 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Skype, Zoom | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Screego if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 10.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Jami Server Bridge or Screego better?
Screego is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jami Server Bridge if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jami Server Bridge and Screego free and open-source?
Yes. Jami Server Bridge is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Screego under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jami Server Bridge and Screego with Docker?
Jami Server Bridge: yes. Screego: check the project docs for container support.