Jaeger vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jaeger
End-to-end distributed tracing for microservices
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | Jaeger | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Web Analytics |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,082 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Datadog APM, New Relic | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jaeger or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jaeger if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jaeger and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jaeger and Umami with Docker?
Jaeger: yes. Umami: yes.