Jaeger vs PostHog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jaeger
End-to-end distributed tracing for microservices
VS
PostHog
Open-source product analytics platform
| Feature | Jaeger | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Web Analytics |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,082 | ★ 37,548 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Datadog APM, New Relic | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jaeger or PostHog better?
Neither is universally better. PostHog has the larger community, while Jaeger is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jaeger and PostHog free and open-source?
Yes. Jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PostHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jaeger and PostHog with Docker?
Jaeger: yes. PostHog: yes.