iodine vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
iodine
IPv4 over DNS tunnel solution, enabling you to start up a socks5 proxy
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | iodine | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | ISC | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,943 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose iodine if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Mature project with 7.9k GitHub stars
- Written in C
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is iodine or NPS better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are iodine and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. iodine is licensed under ISC and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run iodine and NPS with Docker?
iodine: check the project docs for container support. NPS: yes.