InstantDB vs Wasp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
InstantDB
Realtime client-side database with relational queries
VS
Wasp
Declarative full-stack web framework for React and Node
| Feature | InstantDB | Wasp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,383 | ★ 18,663 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Firebase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Choose InstantDB if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Wasp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 18.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is InstantDB or Wasp better?
Neither is universally better. Wasp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are InstantDB and Wasp free and open-source?
Yes. InstantDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wasp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run InstantDB and Wasp with Docker?
InstantDB: yes. Wasp: yes.