innernet vs Wesher
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | innernet | Wesher |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,520 | ★ 988 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Tailscale | Tailscale, ZeroTier |
Why pick each one
Choose innernet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 5.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Wesher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is innernet or Wesher better?
Neither is universally better. innernet has the larger community, while Wesher is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are innernet and Wesher free and open-source?
Yes. innernet is licensed under MIT and Wesher under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run innernet and Wesher with Docker?
innernet: check the project docs for container support. Wesher: check the project docs for container support.