Ingress-NGINX vs Pingora
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ingress-NGINX
Kubernetes ingress controller using NGINX
VS
Pingora
Rust framework to build fast, reliable network services
| Feature | Ingress-NGINX | Pingora |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,485 | ★ 27,153 |
| First released | 2016 | 2024 |
| Replaces | AWS ALB Ingress | Nginx |
Why pick each one
Choose Ingress-NGINX if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 19.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Pingora if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 27.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Ingress-NGINX or Pingora better?
Neither is universally better. Pingora has the larger community, while Ingress-NGINX is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ingress-NGINX and Pingora free and open-source?
Yes. Ingress-NGINX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pingora under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ingress-NGINX and Pingora with Docker?
Ingress-NGINX: check the project docs for container support. Pingora: check the project docs for container support.