InfluxDB vs Smokeping Prober

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBSmokeping Prober
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 729
First released20132018
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamSmokePing, PingPlotter

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Smokeping Prober if…

  • Drop-in for Prometheus stacks
  • Very lightweight
Smokeping Prober details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Smokeping Prober better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community, while Smokeping Prober is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are InfluxDB and Smokeping Prober free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Smokeping Prober under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Smokeping Prober with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Smokeping Prober: yes.

Related comparisons