InfluxDB vs OpenNMS Horizon

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBOpenNMS Horizon
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageRustJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 1,168
First released20132000
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamSolarWinds, PRTG

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose OpenNMS Horizon if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
OpenNMS Horizon details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or OpenNMS Horizon better?

InfluxDB is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenNMS Horizon if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are InfluxDB and OpenNMS Horizon free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and OpenNMS Horizon under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and OpenNMS Horizon with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. OpenNMS Horizon: yes.

Related comparisons