InfluxDB vs Hertzbeat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBHertzbeat
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 7,351
First released20132022
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamZabbix, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Hertzbeat if…

  • No agents to deploy
  • Flexible templates
Hertzbeat details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Hertzbeat better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are InfluxDB and Hertzbeat free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Hertzbeat under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Hertzbeat with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Hertzbeat: yes.

Related comparisons