InfluxDB vs Smokeping

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBSmokeping
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageRustPerl
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 1,938
First released20132003
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamPRTG

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Smokeping if…

  • Excellent for connection quality
  • Lightweight
Smokeping details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Smokeping better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are InfluxDB and Smokeping free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Smokeping under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Smokeping with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Smokeping: yes.

Related comparisons