InfCloud vs Tasks.org CalDAV Sync
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
InfCloud
Web client for CalDAV and CardDAV servers
VS
Tasks.org CalDAV Sync
Open-source calendar and task sync client for Android
| Feature | InfCloud | Tasks.org CalDAV Sync |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Kotlin |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 88 | ★ 2,784 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar web | Google Calendar Sync, iCloud sync |
Why pick each one
Choose InfCloud if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Choose Tasks.org CalDAV Sync if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Frequently asked questions
Is InfCloud or Tasks.org CalDAV Sync better?
Neither is universally better. Tasks.org CalDAV Sync has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are InfCloud and Tasks.org CalDAV Sync free and open-source?
Yes. InfCloud is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tasks.org CalDAV Sync under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run InfCloud and Tasks.org CalDAV Sync with Docker?
InfCloud: check the project docs for container support. Tasks.org CalDAV Sync: check the project docs for container support.