Cal.diy vs InfCloud
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Cal.diy | InfCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,334 | ★ 88 |
| First released | 2026 | 2013 |
| Replaces | — | Google Calendar web |
Why pick each one
Choose Cal.diy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 47.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose InfCloud if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cal.diy or InfCloud better?
Neither is universally better. Cal.diy has the larger community, while InfCloud is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cal.diy and InfCloud free and open-source?
Yes. Cal.diy is licensed under MIT and InfCloud under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cal.diy and InfCloud with Docker?
Cal.diy: check the project docs for container support. InfCloud: check the project docs for container support.