imaginary vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureimaginaryPuter
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 6,076★ 43,003
First released20152026
ReplacesCloudinary, imgix

Why pick each one

Choose imaginary if…

  • Very fast processing
  • Easy to scale
imaginary details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is imaginary or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are imaginary and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. imaginary is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run imaginary and Puter with Docker?

imaginary: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons