Hyphanet vs SimpleX Chat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hyphanet
Anonymously share files, browse and publish _freesites_ (web sites
VS
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
| Feature | Hyphanet | SimpleX Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,204 | ★ 19,211 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram |
Why pick each one
Choose Hyphanet if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hyphanet or SimpleX Chat better?
Neither is universally better. SimpleX Chat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Hyphanet and SimpleX Chat free and open-source?
Yes. Hyphanet is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SimpleX Chat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hyphanet and SimpleX Chat with Docker?
Hyphanet: check the project docs for container support. SimpleX Chat: yes.