Etherpad vs Hyphanet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Etherpad
Real-time collaborative document editor
VS
Hyphanet
Anonymously share files, browse and publish _freesites_ (web sites
| Feature | Etherpad | Hyphanet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,481 | ★ 1,204 |
| First released | 2011 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Docs | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Hyphanet if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Etherpad or Hyphanet better?
Neither is universally better. Etherpad has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Etherpad and Hyphanet free and open-source?
Yes. Etherpad is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Hyphanet under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Etherpad and Hyphanet with Docker?
Etherpad: yes. Hyphanet: check the project docs for container support.