HyperKitty vs Mailman3
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HyperKitty
Web archive interface for Mailman 3 mailing lists
VS
Mailman3
Electronic mailing lists manager
| Feature | HyperKitty | Mailman3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | Python | |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 800 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | — |
| First released | 2014 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Google Groups | Google Groups |
Why pick each one
Choose HyperKitty if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is HyperKitty or Mailman3 better?
Neither is universally better. HyperKitty has the larger community, while Mailman3 is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are HyperKitty and Mailman3 free and open-source?
Yes. HyperKitty is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mailman3 under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HyperKitty and Mailman3 with Docker?
HyperKitty: yes. Mailman3: check the project docs for container support.