Mail-in-a-Box vs HyperKitty
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mail-in-a-Box
Turn a fresh server into a working mail server
VS
HyperKitty
Web archive interface for Mailman 3 mailing lists
| Feature | Mail-in-a-Box | HyperKitty |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | CC0-1.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, one-click | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,385 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2014 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Google Groups |
Why pick each one
Choose HyperKitty if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Mail-in-a-Box or HyperKitty better?
Mail-in-a-Box is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider HyperKitty if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mail-in-a-Box and HyperKitty free and open-source?
Yes. Mail-in-a-Box is licensed under CC0-1.0 and HyperKitty under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mail-in-a-Box and HyperKitty with Docker?
Mail-in-a-Box: check the project docs for container support. HyperKitty: yes.