Hydrus Network vs thumbsup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hydrus Network
Self-hosted tag-based media organizer and image database
VS
thumbsup
Static photo and video gallery generator
| Feature | Hydrus Network | thumbsup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,148 | ★ 860 |
| First released | 2011 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, Eagle | Google Photos, Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Hydrus Network or thumbsup better?
Neither is universally better. Hydrus Network has the larger community, while thumbsup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Hydrus Network and thumbsup free and open-source?
Yes. Hydrus Network is licensed under WTFPL and thumbsup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hydrus Network and thumbsup with Docker?
Hydrus Network: check the project docs for container support. thumbsup: check the project docs for container support.