Hydrus Network vs PiGallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Hydrus Network | PiGallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 88 · Excellent | 82 · Excellent |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,211 | ★ 2,283 |
| First released | 2011 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, Eagle | Google Photos |
What are Hydrus Network and PiGallery2?
Hydrus Network
Hydrus Network is a personal media management application that lets you import images and files, tag them, and search a private collection with a powerful tag system. It includes a client-server architecture so the database can be self-hosted and accessed remotely.
- Powerful tag-based search
- Client-server architecture
- Local-first media database
- Duplicate detection
PiGallery2
PiGallery2 is a fast, directory-driven photo gallery server that does not move or modify your files. It supports faces, geolocation maps, and a powerful search syntax with a lightweight footprint.
- Directory-based galleries
- Geolocation maps
- Powerful search syntax
- Read-only on your files
Hydrus Network vs PiGallery2: key differences
Hydrus Network is written in Python, while PiGallery2 is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — WTFPL for Hydrus Network versus MIT for PiGallery2. PiGallery2 is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Hydrus Network. Hydrus Network is the more established project (first released 2011), while PiGallery2 arrived in 2016. PiGallery2 lists first-class Docker deployment; Hydrus Network does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Hydrus Network if…
- Extremely powerful tagging
- Handles huge collections
Watch out for
- Steep learning curve
- Complex interface
Choose PiGallery2 if…
- Does not touch your files
- Runs well on a Raspberry Pi
Watch out for
- No editing features
- Limited multi-user support
Frequently asked questions
Is Hydrus Network or PiGallery2 better?
Neither is universally better. Hydrus Network has the larger community, while PiGallery2 is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Hydrus Network and PiGallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. Hydrus Network is licensed under WTFPL and PiGallery2 under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hydrus Network and PiGallery2 with Docker?
Hydrus Network: check the project docs for container support. PiGallery2: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Hydrus Network or PiGallery2?
PiGallery2 has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Hydrus Network. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Hydrus Network vs Damselfly
- PiGallery2 vs Damselfly
- Hydrus Network vs Danbooru
- Hydrus Network vs digiKam
- PiGallery2 vs digiKam
- Hydrus Network vs Ente Photos
- PiGallery2 vs Ente Photos
- Hydrus Network vs fgallery
- PiGallery2 vs fgallery
- Hydrus Network vs Google Photos Takeout Helper
- PiGallery2 vs Google Photos Takeout Helper