Huginn vs UpSnap
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
VS
UpSnap
Wake-on-LAN dashboard to power devices on and off
| Feature | Huginn | UpSnap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,759 | ★ 6,112 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | IFTTT, Zapier | Commercial WOL apps |
Why pick each one
Choose UpSnap if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Huginn or UpSnap better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community, while UpSnap is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Huginn and UpSnap free and open-source?
Yes. Huginn is licensed under MIT and UpSnap under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Huginn and UpSnap with Docker?
Huginn: yes. UpSnap: yes.